Affiliated with the University of Nicosia |
|||||
|
|||||
EU as a global Actor By Ingemar Lindahl
|
|||||
|
|||||
Ambassador of Sweden in the Republic of Cyprus |
|||||
|
|||||
There is now less than two months left of the
Swedish Presidency. For this six-month period we had set two main
priorities - and the two main challenges for the EU - the international
economic crisis on the one hand, and the global climate negotiations on
the other hand.
A third priority has been the strengthening of the EU´s relations with
its neighborhood and the outside world. for increased security and
increased democracy.
In this context, it has been our ambition to promote the EU as an open
project and continue the process of enlargement. Accession negotiations
with Turkey and Croatia are right now on our agenda. Moreover, the
Council has referred Iceland’s membership application to the Commission
to prepare an avis. We continue to encourage the EU-integration of the
countries in the Western Balkans, in accordance with the reform progress
in each country.
The European Neighborhood Policy and the implementation of the Eastern
Partnership, as well as the development of our cooperation with our
neighbors in the Mediterranean region, are also an important part of our
work to build security and democracy in our neighborhood.
Preparedness to deal with unexpected events is an important
responsibility of every Presidency. So far, no major crisis has
occurred, but we continue to be ready to respond proactively to sudden
developments on the global stage.
Already on our agenda, we have of course the developments in i.a.
Afghanistan/Pakistan, the Middle East, Iran, North Korea and Burma which
continue to call for our attention and partial involvement.
We are now on the eve of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and
intense consultations are going on regarding the appointment of a new SG/HR
and the setting up of the European External Action Service. The Treaty
will make the EU a more capable, coherent and effective actor on the
global scene.
And this is timely, in view of the increasing demand for EU action and
engagement in different parts of the world.
The EU has, during the last decade, proven that it has the potential to
be a truly global actor, with a number of policy instruments at its
disposal. Instruments for military and civilian crisis management are
complemented by development, trade and other policy instruments.
But improvements are needed and the Lisbon Treaty will enable the
EU to enhance its contribution to international peace and security.
Looking back at the development of the European Security and Defence
Policy (ESDP), there are reasons to be proud, and to celebrate the 10th
anniversary of the groundbreaking decisions taken by the European
Council in Cologne and Helsinki in 1999. With an impressive speed, the
institutional structures, the concepts and the civilian and military
instruments have been developed. Not to speak of the over 20 missions
and operations that have been carried out or are carried out until now.
At the same time, in spite of the progress made, there is still a
discrepancy between the demand for EU action and the EU’s ability to
respond to this demand. This is a challenge we should be ready to take
on.
Admittedly, this is not an easy task. We are facing a more complex global
environment than just a few years ago. New threats and challenges have
emerged – cyber security, energy security, infectious diseases, climate
change, piracy – just to name a few.
We also see that internal and external security are becoming increasingly
interlinked – which calls for a more flexible view on the development
and use of different instruments and policies. The financial crisis has
made us painfully aware of the security implications of financial
collapse, something that calls for concerted action on the part of the
EU.
The Lisbon Treaty gives us the hardware of institutions, which is very
important. But we also need the software of policies. A common policy
framework is a cornerstone in building capacity to act on the global
stage. If we agree on what our policy should be, it is much easier to
come up with the necessary resources – both in financial terms and in
terms of capabilities. Therefore, we should develop the software of
policies, with an ambition to foster a common strategic culture among
the 27 Member States.
Certainly, we are not starting from scratch. We have the European
Security Strategy and the Implementation Report from last year. This is
a good basis to build upon.
Furthermore, by carrying out crisis management operations with broad
participation from the Member States, we are gradually acquiring
experience and building up a common strategic vision.
But more is needed. We also have to develop our analytical and policy
planning capacity at EU-level and make sure we learn from our successes
- but more importantly - from our failures. A closer cooperation and
exchange with think-tanks and academic institutions is key in this
context.
Matching resources with priorities is very important
task. We have to make sure that there is a strong coherence between our
policy-making on the one hand, and the budget processes on the other
hand. However, there is insufficient flexibility in budget allocations
to respond to new or changing priorities. The Budget review and the next
Financial Perspective constitute important opportunities for realignment
of the EU´s external spending.
We also need to make sure that we have the right instruments at our
disposal. For different reasons, our crisis management instruments are
not always well-suited for the tasks we are expected to carry out.
We have to continue to work on the development of capabilities, civilian
as well as military and a lot has been done during the Swedish
Presidency.
The French Presidency contributed to a renewed impetus for the ESDP with
the Capability Declaration as part of the conclusions at the European
Council in December 2008. The Capability Declaration is important also
for the development of civilian capabilities. The Czech Presidency has
made an important work in following-up on these commitments and paved
the way for a continued development of civilian and military
capabilities.
In fact, this week the Foreign and Defence Ministers of the European
Union met in Brussels and taken a number of important decisions, based
on the work carried out during the last few months.
Among other things, the Ministers have adopted a declaration on the
future development of the ESDP, in light of ten years of experiences and
in light of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. This declaration
provides a future-oriented and ambitious agenda for our further work in
this field in order to make us a more relevant and efficient
international actor.
On the military side, I would like to draw your attention to the use of
Battlegroups – a potentially very useful tool to the support of
international peace and security. The Battlegroups also play an
important role in the transformation of the Armed Forces in many
countries, not the least in Sweden.
However, as you are well aware, the Battlegroups have not yet been used.
Sweden has initiated a discussion on the usability and flexibility in
the implementation of the Battlegroup concept and Ministers will agree
on conclusions to this effect.
During the Swedish Presidency, we have also worked on the area of
maritime surveillance. There are obvious synergies between military and
civilian maritime surveillance and a need for close cooperation in order
to avoid duplication. At this week’s Ministerial Meeting, conclusions
supporting a more integrated approach to maritime surveillance has also
been adopted.
In addition to these priorities, there is a need for continued work to
promote a more competitive and innovative defense industry. Important
initiatives have been taken by the EDA and the European Commission,
creating the basis for the continued development of the European defense
industry. Sweden supports this work and has focused on transparency and
harmonization – in order to achieve a stronger European Defense and
Industrial Technological Base. Also in this field, the Ministers
adopted conclusions at their Brussels Meeting.
On the civilian side, we are trying to improve the supply of personnel,
lessons learned processes, mission support and training etc. Rule-of-law
missions – a niche capacity of the EU – is an instrument with a
particularly important potential that should be further explored.
And we have to ensure the adequate financing is available for the
planning and start-up of operations.
We are also promoting civilian-military cooperation and trying to make
the use of different instruments more integrated – at strategic level as
well as in the field. The aim should be to carry out `policy
operations´, not purely defined `civilian´ or `military´ operations.
During this week’s Ministerial Meeting, the Ministers agreed on the
importance of more coordinated civilian and military capability
development processes, as is also reflected in the Declaration.
Moreover, we must pay due attention to the closer link between security,
development and human rights, as well as to the work on the
implementation of the UNSCR 1325 (Women peace and security) and 1820
(Sexual violence in conflict) and the two recently adopted UNSCR 1888
and 1889.
The Swedish Presidency is making efforts to advance the agenda in these
areas. The EU´s unique capacity to act as a mediator at different levels
should be developed further, and a process that is now well under way
with a concept to be adopted by Ministers.
As for ongoing crisis management missions and operations, we are engaged
in discussions on EU’s future military presence in Bosnia. The aim is to
gradually transfer it to a
non-executive mission, intended to strengthen local defence structures.
At the same time, political developments, including upcoming Bosnian
elections, point to the need for EU to be ready to respond to security
challenges also during 2010.
In addition, we are discussing a broader engagement in Somalia to
complement our naval operation,
Atalanta. Specifically, we are now looking at opportunities for
EU to engage in out-of-the-country training of Somali security forces.
Given the situation in the country, many challenges are involved. French
experiences from training conducted in Djibouti will have to be taken
into account.
Furthermore, we are trying to make sure that EUPOL Afghanistan becomes
fully staffed – this is long overdue -
and that the EULEX Kosovo can show results and play a stabilizing
role in the country.
Despite the wide range of instruments at its disposal, the EU cannot act
in isolation. Effective multilateralism, with the UN at its core, is a
cornerstone of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. We have seen
improvements in the EU’s cooperation with other international
organizations, like the UN, NATO, OSCE as well as with other global and
regional powers.
But more can be done. We have important experiences to draw upon. At the
Ministerial Meeting in Brussels the new NATO SG met with our Foreign and
Defence Ministers to discuss challenges of common interest. It became a
rich and animated meeting. Both sides want more and smoother cooperation
Within the broader framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy,
we have to deepen our strategic partnerships. We should continue to
build a true transatlantic partnership with the US, and work closely on
issues like climate, energy, trade and crisis management. We should have
the ambition to conduct a comprehensive and frank dialogue with Russia,
and deal with issues like human rights, common
neighborhood,
protracted conflicts etc. Relations with China and India should be
developed further.
Last, but not least, the EU
will have to continue to play an active and leading role in the
discussions on the European Security Architecture, in cooperation with
CiO and partners. We are now preparing for the OSCE Ministerial Meeting
in Athens in December, with a focus on comprehensive security,
transparency and EU-unity.
To sum up, our focus is on:
- with a strong ambition to strengthen the
EU as a global actor;
- with a commitment to continue the process of enlargement and a
deepening of our relations with neighboring countries;
- with an accentuated effort to sharpen our crisis management
instruments;
- with a practical approach to broaden our cooperation with other
organizations and our strategic partnerships.
|
|||||
|
|||||
Cyprus Center for European and
International Affairs Copyright © 2009. All rights reserved
|
|||||
Makedonitissis 46, 2417 Egkomi CYPRUS | P.O.Box 24005, 1700 CYPRUS t: +35722841600 | f: +35722357964 | cceia@unic.ac.cy | www.cceia.unic.ac.cy |